![emilio pujol guitar school book 1 emilio pujol guitar school book 1](https://static.nakas.gr/uploads/resources/285696/pujol-emilio-i-scholi-tis-kitharas-vivlio-3o-huge.jpg)
"Chicago Blues Rhythm Guitar" by Bob Margolin and Dave Rubin (Bob was in Muddy Water’s band) - great information about history, specific performer styles, subtleties of rhythm and style, etc.
![emilio pujol guitar school book 1 emilio pujol guitar school book 1](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/PTDOHvUtKpI/maxresdefault.jpg)
You need to find ones that meet your specific needs and style.Īfter examining perhaps a hundred method books, here are two method books that I found very useful and was able to complete beginning to end.Įach had CD’s with great examples and practice exercises, including complete tunes.Īssuming proficiency with guitar, I estimated the time to complete: I think that method books are as individualist as music teachers. This may be the case for orchestra conductors, especially for amateur or school orchestras where you can´t expect the players to know about all the techniques that are required for playing the piece. Also, method books can be a good way of looking into the technique of an instrument you don´t play yourself but want/have to know about. In the end, not every musician needs a method book, but if you have musical ambitions that go beyond what the teachers available to you can teach, then using a method book might be a good idea.
Emilio pujol guitar school book 1 how to#
To put an example: If a book promises me to teach me how to construct walking bass lines from scratch, I want it to start at "this is a bass clef, you read it like that" and step by step take me to advanced harmonic progressions (modal interchange, tritone sub, mediants …) and the many ways to deal with them as a bass player. What do I want from a method book? That it keeps its promises. Also for me as a music teacher they of course are resources for teaching. I find all of them useful for finding new techniques which I could then employ not only on the instrument they are designed for, but on many other instruments as well. However, I own several methods for diverse instruments/techniques ranging from beatboxing and bodhrán via jazz piano and classical piano to the complete vocal technique book. That being said, I´ve never "completed" a method book as in learning how to play exactly the things written in the book. At that point the student might want to look for other resources, which may well be method books. In that case you need to rely on method books, online tutorials and, if you have the money and time to do so, make trips to workshop week(end)s.īut even with the teacher mentioned above, there will inevitably come a point where the student wants to learn things that the teacher is not proficient in. The chances of finding a teacher who can both play the blues guitar and teach it will be minimal. Also, the teacher-student-relation should be a harmonious one.īut let´s say you want to learn blues guitar and you live in a rural area of any country on earth (apart from the US maybe). Well, I guess the ideal way of learning anything is a teacher who is competent in both the thing and teaching the thing. My question is, how good can a method book be? Do you think they are necessary and essential? Is this something you feel every musician should be doing, or just another learning method? # So it would be silly to believe you can learn everything you need to know from a book.
![emilio pujol guitar school book 1 emilio pujol guitar school book 1](https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1394360949i/8278191._UY630_SR1200,630_.jpg)
And I hear some of the world’s hardest music(that still retains its aesthetic integrity) can take years to learn. A tune, a song, even a technique can take hours, weeks, months to learn.
![emilio pujol guitar school book 1 emilio pujol guitar school book 1](https://www.researchgate.net/profile/David-Buch/publication/346473728/figure/fig2/AS:963361420357632@1606694669731/Tarrega-in-1896_Q320.jpg)
Listening, reading, practicing, and then doing all of that again for an indefinite length of time. But what’s so different about a method book, than just learning music unguided? They are workbooks, and to get through them, you have to commit to the exercises and repertoire. But method books are different from reading books. I’ve always thought of reading books as potentially very beneficial for learning about, and understanding, whatever it was you were interested in, given the book was well-written, informative, and accurate. Has anyone ever committed to completing a method book(of any style or genre of music you were studying)? If so, how did you like it? Did you feel like it was worth the time and effort? Did you reach any short or long-term goals?